Fiber Laser Code Printing vs Traditional Coding Methods: Comparing the Pros and Cons

Author: Correct Pack - Laser Marking Machine Manufacturer

Fiber Laser Code Printing vs Traditional Coding Methods: Comparing the Pros and Cons

Have you ever wondered how products get their codes? Barcode scanning has become a norm in stores and warehouses with the intention of keeping track of inventory, managing supply chain operations, and preventing counterfeits. Various coding techniques are now available but fiber laser code printing stands out. Why? It provides a fast, efficient, and legible way of applying codes on a range of materials. Is it, however, a better option when compared to traditional coding methods? Let’s dive into the pros and cons of fiber laser code printing compared to traditional coding methods.

High-quality output

Substandard output is often a concern in traditional coding methods, especially when printing codes on flexible and soft materials such as plastic and paper. Low quality scanning images may result that render the codes unreadable. The fiber laser technique, however, produces high-quality output that offers crisp and clear codes that can be easily scanned. This allows sorting errors to be minimized, thus improving accuracy in production.

Speed

Speed is a crucial factor in production. Fiber laser code printing provides an efficient way of coding products by printing them at high speed. Traditional coding methods, such as inkjet printing, may cause delays that slow down production. Fiber laser printers have higher printing speeds than traditional coding methods, allowing for quick marking without stopping the production line.

Durability

The durability of a code label is essential in industries such as healthcare, food, and beverage where traces of the products must be kept through their lifespan. Traditional coding methods such as inkjet and label printing can easily smudge, fade, and wear off, making it difficult to identify the product. Fiber laser code printing, on the other hand, creates long-lasting marks that remain legible throughout the product's lifecycle.

Cost-effectiveness

When it comes to cost-effectiveness, traditional coding methods win compared to fiber laser code printing. The fiber laser equipment can be expensive to install, maintain, and repair. Traditional coding methods such as inkjet printing and labeling are cost-effective in terms of equipment and maintenance. However, recurring costs such as ink and label roll replacement may arise and increase the operational cost.

Environmental impact

The issue of environmental sustainability has become a concern for manufacturers. Traditional coding methods have been known to use materials such as ink and label roll paper that have a negative impact on the environment. Fiber laser coding, on the other hand, uses renewable energy to operate and produces minimal carbon footprints. Therefore, when choosing between code printing methods, manufacturers can opt for fiber laser code printing, which offers positive sustainability vibes.

In conclusion, both traditional coding methods and fiber laser code printing have their unique advantages and drawbacks. When deciding on the best approach, manufacturers must consider their specific needs and objectives. Fiber laser code printing offers high-quality output, speed, and durability, which is ideal when coding expiration and manufacturing dates. Traditional coding methods, on the other hand, are cost-effective and well-suited for small businesses that have a limited budget. When choosing between these two options, manufacturers must weigh up their pros and cons and consider their specific needs and objectives.